All but 2 states in the U.S. have some form of legalized gambling. Hawaii is one of them. However, as the Aloha State faces billion-dollar deficits, its lawmakers are considering gambling as a means to financial recovery. You can read an article about the Hawaii situation here as well as link to the Hawaii Coalition Against Gambling here.
In the legal arena, gambling is always a “dicey” subject, if you will pardon the pun. Whenever gambling is brought up, it is typically opposed by many of the same foes that oppose legalizing prostitution, gay marriage, marijuana use, and the like. Where do you stand? Do you think that gambling is an appropriate way for a state to balance its budget? Have you noticed any particular good or ill that legalized gambling has caused in your own state?
I found myself thinking on this rather unlikely subject today as I read about the legal plight of two Connecticut sisters, Theresa Sokaitis (84) and Rose Bakaysa (87). Sokaitis sued Bakaysa over $500,000 in lottery winnings in 2005, claiming the sisters had a written contract to share all gambling and lottery prizes. Bakaysa countered that the agreement was canceled by mutual, verbal consent in 2004 when they suffered a dispute over a $250 loan. Significantly, since the legal dispute arose, court documents say, the sisters ended once-routine casino trips together and “did not speak or have any contact.”
“What came between these sisters was money,” New Britain, Conn., Superior Court Judge Cynthia Swienton wrote in a decision released Wednesday. What a shocker?!? As an attorney, it has never ceased to amaze me how often this proves to be the case.
Perhaps, Hawaii ought to consider the Sokaitis-Bakaysa case as well. What do you think? You can read more about the case in an interesting USA Today article here. In additio, here is a link to an article from the Mayo Clinic on compulsive gambling.